This Documentary is brought to you by Conspiracy Scope.
Now in his controversial follow-up – Titanic: The Ship that Never Sank – Robin Gardiner goes further into the scandal of the sinking, not only with more evidence on the alleged ‘scam’ perpetrated by the While Star line but also with further evidence showing the possible collusion of the British government in the cover-up.
Robin Gardiner’s remarkable new account of what really happened on that terrible night reveals fresh evidence which sheds new light on the circumstances.
Free Your Mind @ May 3, 2014
In the modern times of the internet and digital devices permeating our daily habits and routines, the issue of privacy is becoming more and more of a hot button issue. One needs to just look at how Facebook is increasingly encroaching upon the vast amounts of personal information that is recorded willingly and correlated with friends and family to understand that there is a huge amount of our personal lives available for review, whether it be for commercial marketing reasons or for legal justifications. Many scandals have come out regarding AT&T working with our government to intercept our phone calls, our text messages and other private communications. Such breaches of privacy have even come with legislation giving these companies retroactive immunity from prosecution for snooping around in our personal lives, regardless of their motivations.
But what if such ways of obtaining personal information were considerably outdated?
The NSA may think so.
Remote Neural Monitoring is a way to measure the EMF (electro magnetic frequency) waves of an individual and are able to translate them into the words heard/spoken and the images seen by an individual. Labeled under the Signal Intelligence department, remote neural monitoring is a technology that has been around and used for quite some time and has been kept secret from the public along with all other developments of electronic weaponry, research and development of paid for by the taxpayers.
While it may seem a bit of a stretch to consider that it is possible for technology to read our minds and that this technology would be kept from the public, there has been a lawsuit against the NSA claiming remote monitoring and manipulation. John St. Claire Akwei filed a lawsuit detailing his comprehension of the secretive NSA technology and its’ covert operations against unwitting citizens.
How does the technology work?
Remote neural monitoring focuses on the audio and visual portions of the brain by sending signals which are then transmitted back to the origin and analyzed by a computer. While the decoding and encoding of brain signals for surreptitious communication with someone’s brain is certainly a complex feat, there is much that can be done from a remote vantage using this technology. The technology can measure sounds that an individual hears, can transmit its’ own words and images into the brain and can manipulate emotions and behavior. A prison study in Vacaville, conducted by IBM was able to cause complete lethargy in prisoners to the point where sleep was imposed for 18-20 hours per day. Indeed, the spectrum of human emotion and reaction is up for remote manipulation. Paranoia can be instilled as easily as anger. The ability to force emotional reactions on people is a very important consideration as it is a dangerous tool which opens the possibility for people to force criminal behavior without culpability. Forcing a suicide in a depressed individual, as some people have considered the possibility, constitutes remote murder and would be untraceable.
The type of research for this is certainly invasive and due to the manipulations possible the secrecy for it is indeed paramount as they would send every human rights organization into a frenzy. Cloaked under reasons of national security (but developed by the corporate and university worlds), the information and technology has been ridiculed in official mainstream media to dissuade any actual consideration. Thusly, the technology is now free to be used in secret and without any oversight or transparency.
But the concerns aren’t just based on privacy rights. Many scientists and human rights advocacy groups are claiming that the unknown risks imposed on a person when targeted could be hazardous to ones health. Sources cite a Cold War example, from the 1960’s in which the Soviet Union beamed radiation into the American Embassy in Russia, causing health problems that were studied by the Americans in an operation dubbed ‘Project Pandoa’. The Soviet Union, along with the United States, were developing electromagnetic weapons in what was the Cold War era – developing psychotronic weapons as opposed to solely developing nuclear weaponry as the mainstream media focused upon.
In essence, the reality of remote neural monitoring is the result of decades of research into behavioral modification of human beings, with the goal to be able to remotely influence the actions and mental perception of any given individual. The reality of such a goal really brings a lot of very human ideas to the forefront. Such as, what is consciousness and what constitutes the individual. Is it okay for people to understand the very nature of the human animal and how it reacts without sharing such knowledge? Is it okay to manipulate someone into believing a false reality? Is it okay to create a false reality to further these aims, such as Fox news recently winning a case against a whistleblower asserting its’ rights to mislead the public intentionally as a protection of free speech?
The list goes on and while there is a subsection of the population fighting to expose this technology and the implications it has for humanities future, there are still a lot of people who aren’t even aware that remote neural monitoring is even possible. Others that have heard of it have no idea how to incorporate the knowledge as the effects, if one were targeted, are on such a subtle level as to make conscious awareness a very difficult endeavor especially when society has already been conditioned to consider that these types of concerns are born of mental illness.
The persuasion of opinion has long been a goal of authority. To remain in the position of authority, one must have the agreement of the populace. Can it be considered agreement if the populace is subconsciously manipulated into agreement? Or does it matter if the populace does not comprehend or recognize that their agreement was pre-determined and manufactured beforehand?
Such basic questions are exactly what we consider human rights and to keep such weapons in secret for the consideration of only an elite few is certainly an epic travesty and breach of humanity. No longer must we be concerned about the lies we are being fed from mainstream media and even our leaders. Now we must consider whether or not our opinion and agreement were perhaps manufactured by them.
This article is written by Ryan Watton for Mind Power World: http://www.MindPowerWorld.com
Free Your Mind @ April 26, 2014
Click Here If You Don’t See A Video Screen
Find out what actually caused the 2008 crash. See why the “war on drugs” is nothing more than a scam. In the 9 minute clip above on the Keiser Report, you will see the connection between The Federal Reserve Bank, Wall Street, and Cocaine. Don’t miss out on this one. The information is unfortunately enlightening!
Free Your Mind @ August 18, 2013
Gun Control Conspiracy In America?
Today, I would like to talk about a very controversial subject. Gun Control. In the wake of all of the shootings that have happened recently, discussion of, and support of gun control laws has risen. And of course, this has produced big time push back from “the right to bear arms” supporters.
Gun control is one of the biggest battlefields that exist in today’s society (just like internet freedom) as people desperately are trying to hold on to the few freedoms that they have left. And they are few.
Obama has recently made a strong push to curb gun violence. And that has also received push-back from those people, and even law enforcement agencies saying that they will not support anything that is unconstitutional.
There seems to be two compelling arguments on both sides of this. On one hand, if we would stop being so loosey goosey, letting everyone have guns, then a lot of these shootings wouldn’t happen. The other side is that guns don’t kill people. People kill people. And if someone wants to harm someone or some people, they will find a way. But… guns certainly make it easier to kill a lot of people… right? I’m sure that there is less likely to be a mass stabbing, or a mass box cuttering, or mass choking than a mass shooting.
But… there are some things that are problematic about gun control. One of them is of course, illegal guns. You see, criminals get guns illegally. So if you take guns out of peoples hands, wouldn’t you be disarming the good guys (for lack of a better term)? There are also those that have made the argument that if someone had a gun (for example in the Dark Knight Rises shooting) that that person could have stopped a crazy shooter.
There are also people who claimed that there should be more armed people at places like schools and that could help solve the problem. Others believe that is ridiculous.
But today, I want to go deeper into the subject of gun control because there are a couple of elephants in the room that very few people want to address. I consider myself to be a sane and peaceful person. So… if you where to place a gun in my place of resident, I wouldn’t just go out and start shooting people… JUST BECAUSE THERE WAS A GUN IN MY HOUSE. And I think that the same can be said for ANY sane person!
So… if an individual where to go out and start blasting massive amounts of people, then something obviously would be wrong with that particular person. And if a whole bunch of people just started going out and conducting mass shootings then COMMON SENSE would have to intervene and say, “Hmmmmm… I wonder why all of these people are going out and killing all these people.”
HEY MAN… WE LIVE IN A SICK SOCIETY. PEOPLE ARE CRAZY! IT’S JUST THE WORLD WE LIVE IN! SO WE NEED TO TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT OUR PEOPLE!
At first glance, this sentiment actually seems to make sense. People are crazy nowadays. But why is that?
John Noveske, a famous rifle manufacturer made a very controversial post on his Facebook page six days after the world came to an end on Dec 27, 2012
Here is his post.
Not sure about the facts here, I received this from a friend.
Eric Harris age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold aged 18 (Colombine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold’s medical records have never been made available to the public.
Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather’s girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.
Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.
Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.
Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.
Mathew Miller, age 13, hung himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.
Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.
Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.
A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.
Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..
A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.
Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.
TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.
Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.
James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.
Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania
Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) – school shooting in El Cajon, California
Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.
Chris Shanahan, age 15 (Paxil) in Rigby, ID who out of the blue killed a woman.
Jeff Franklin (Prozac and Ritalin), Huntsville, AL, killed his parents as they came home from work using a sledge hammer, hatchet, butcher knife and mechanic’s file, then attacked his younger brothers and sister.
Neal Furrow (Prozac) in LA Jewish school shooting reported to have been court-ordered to be on Prozac along with several other medications.
Kevin Rider, age 14, was withdrawing from Prozac when he died from a gunshot wound to his head. Initially it was ruled a suicide, but two years later, the investigation into his death was opened as a possible homicide. The prime suspect, also age 14, had been taking Zoloft and other SSRI antidepressants.
Alex Kim, age 13, hung himself shortly after his Lexapro prescription had been doubled.
Diane Routhier was prescribed Welbutrin for gallstone problems. Six days later, after suffering many adverse effects of the drug, she shot herself.
Billy Willkomm, an accomplished wrestler and a University of Florida student, was prescribed Prozac at the age of 17. His family found him dead of suicide – hanging from a tall ladder at the family’s Gulf Shore Boulevard home in July 2002.
Kara Jaye Anne Fuller-Otter, age 12, was on Paxil when she hung herself from a hook in her closet. Kara’s parents said “…. the damn doctor wouldn’t take her off it and I asked him to when we went in on the second visit. I told him I thought she was having some sort of reaction to Paxil…”)
Gareth Christian, Vancouver, age 18, was on Paxil when he committed suicide in 2002,
(Gareth’s father could not accept his son’s death and killed himself.)
Julie Woodward, age 17, was on Zoloft when she hung herself in her family’s detached garage.
Matthew Miller was 13 when he saw a psychiatrist because he was having difficulty at school. The psychiatrist gave him samples of Zoloft. Seven days later his mother found him dead, hanging by a belt from a laundry hook in his closet.
Kurt Danysh, age 18, and on Prozac, killed his father with a shotgun. He is now behind prison bars, and writes letters, trying to warn the world that SSRI drugs can kill.
Woody ____, age 37, committed suicide while in his 5th week of taking Zoloft. Shortly before his death his physician suggested doubling the dose of the drug. He had seen his physician only for insomnia. He had never been depressed, nor did he have any history of any mental illness symptoms.
A boy from Houston, age 10, shot and killed his father after his Prozac dosage was increased.
Hammad Memon, age 15, shot and killed a fellow middle school student. He had been diagnosed with ADHD and depression and was taking Zoloft and “other drugs for the conditions.”
Matti Saari, a 22-year-old culinary student, shot and killed 9 students and a teacher, and wounded another student, before killing himself. Saari was taking an SSRI and a benzodiazapine.
Steven Kazmierczak, age 27, shot and killed five people and wounded 21 others before killing himself in a Northern Illinois University auditorium. According to his girlfriend, he had recently been taking Prozac, Xanax and Ambien. Toxicology results showed that he still had trace amounts of Xanax in his system.
Finnish gunman Pekka-Eric Auvinen, age 18, had been taking antidepressants before he killed eight people and wounded a dozen more at Jokela High School – then he committed suicide.
Asa Coon from Cleveland, age 14, shot and wounded four before taking his own life. Court records show Coon was on Trazodone.
Jon Romano, age 16, on medication for depression, fired a shotgun at a teacher in his New York high school.
Missing from list…3 of 4 known to have taken these same meds….
What drugs was Jared Lee Loughner on, age 21…… killed 6 people and injuring 14 others in Tuscon, Az
What drugs was James Eagan Holmes on, age 24….. killed 12 people and injuring 59 others in Aurora Colorado
What drugs was Jacob Tyler Roberts on, age 22, killed 2 injured 1, Clackamas Or
What drugs was Adam Peter Lanza on, age 20, Killed 26 and wounded 2 in Newtown Ct
Roberts is the only one that I haven’t heard about being on drugs of some kind
Also, consider this list of school shootings and antidepressants.
John was killed in a car accident a couple of weeks after he made this post.
When you combine this with the fact that antidepressants don’t work any better than a placebo, do more harm than good, and are less effective than exercise, everything becomes clear. Ladies and gentlemen… this is not rocket science. This is not brain surgery. And this doesn’t require 360 degrees or even 33 1/3 degrees of knowledge to figure out. PSYCHIATRIC DRUGS ARE THE PROBLEM!!!! Or at least the large part of it.
Now… I could sit up here and talk about MK Ultra, mind control chemicals used by the NAZIs and how these same chemicals are used in psychiatric drugs given to school kids, false flag terrorism etc… but I’m trying to stay off of conspiracy island at least for a minute because I want to appeal to all individuals (who can think).
Everyone is talking about gun control… but why is no one talking about psycho dr… oops, I mean psychiatric drug control? After all, drunk drivers kill more people than guns, but nobody wants to ban alcohol. They just say, “drink responsibly” (as if a person can be responsible, after they are drunk).
BUT MATT… THEY AREN’T TRYING TO TAKE AWAY GUNS… THEY ARE JUST TRYING TO RESTRICT HOW THEY ARE BEING GIVEN OUT!
Well, that is a valid point. So are people overreacting to this whole situation? Maybe. But consider the following.
You see… the concept of gun control is not a new concept. It’s an old one. And what’s crazy about it, was that it was always used by the same type of people.
Check out the following info from Joe Wolverton II, JD
After World War I the Weihmar Republic began to pass gun laws in response to the increasing presence of terroris… oops, I mean communist that were in Germany at the time. Because of this “emergency situation”, in 1919 they passed the Regulations of the Council of the People’s Delegates on Weapons Possession act. All firearms and firearm ammunition were to be surrendered immediately. Anyone caught with a firearm would be subject to a fine or even prison time. Have you seen this movie?
August of 1920, they passed the Law on the Disarmament of the People. This law commissioned that a list of assault we… oops, I mean… “military weapons” be made that were subject to immediate seizure (I mean, after all… why would anyone need a military weapon… right?).
There was also a provision in the law that required citizens to turn in the names of those who had outlawed weapons and/or were “hoarding ammo.”
The next law passed in 1928 was the Law on Firearms and Ammunition. This required licensing of anyone who manufactured, assembled or repaired firearms and ammunition. The trade and sale of arms and ammunition was forbidden without a license.
This license would be issued at the will of the government and the applicant was required to show that he was reliable and had a need for a gun (background check).
The law also placed limits on the types of and numbers of weapons that could be owned. You would have to seek a special license if you wanted to have more than 5 guns or more than 100 rounds of ammo. I mean… why do you need a bunch of guns… and a bunch of ammo… right?
And of course, in theory, these laws all made perfect sense. That is… until we find out that all of these so called Communists were all given their guns by the Germans… and when they committed or were suspected of committing crimes, it was used as an excuse to pass more restrictive gun laws.
“It Aint No Fun When The Rabbits Got The Guns”
And when the Enabling Act was passed, it was pretty much a wrap. Hitler issued a decree that basically stated that you could either join the SA, SS, or the Stahlhelm or be considered an enemy of the national government if you tried to keep or hide your weapon without authorization.
So of course when NAZI Germany was turned into a police state, the people obviously could not defend themselves with limited guns, and limited ammo. I’m sure that those people would have now liked to have those “military style” weapons back, as they at that point saw plenty good reason to use them.
“So, what are you saying? Is the government is staging these shootings to scare the population into giving up their guns?!!!!!!!”
Let’s go back to John’s Facebook post. The first incident that he mentioned was Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold in the infamous Columbine Trenchcoat Mafia massacre. This was a terrible shooting that brought America to it’s knees.
It’s also interesting to note that the FBI agent in charge of investigating the massacre, Dwayne Fuselier… had a SON Scott Fuselier who had done a video depicting the same type of massacre at Columbine high school TWO YEARS before it occurred! No conflict of interest.
Dwayne’s OTHER son was at the school and “managed to escape” to tell the official story that we all have heard. 101 witnesses identified more than 2 shooters, a lot of them identified FOUR (some of them specifically naming the other two) shooters. Read the unanswered questions here.
The Virginia Tech Massacre
Another interesting massacre was Virginia Tech. Seung-Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people, wounded 17 others in two separate attacks, two hours apart, and then committed suicide.
But what is interesting is that he committed suicide by shooting himself twice in the chest and once in the back of the head. Ladies and Gentlemen… WHO DA HELL SHOOTS THEMSELVES TWICE IN THE CHEST AND ONCE IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD?!
Why was there a lag of more than two hours after the first shootings before an alarm was e-mailed campus-wide? And why were the police given orders to stand down and not pursue the killer while all this transpired. You can read more about the oddities of this event HERE and HERE
Powerful information indeed. And after both of these incidents, citizens cried out for gun laws to protect them. Now… what was your question again?
“So, what are you saying? Is the government is staging these shootings to scare the population into giving up their guns?!!!!!!!”
I don’t know… you tell me!
But I digress. Moving right along… The NAZI’s weren’t the only ones that restricted gun laws. Let’s go back a little bit further ( I know that you are going to love this one). In December of 1773 in response to the British government’s draconian tax policy, The Sons of Liberty staged what we now know of as the Boston Tea Party.
After this protest, the British Parliament passed a set of Restraining Acts in 1774 to control the colonies. These acts only provoked the colonists. In Massachusetts, town hall meetings were outlawed, so when an illegal meeting was taking place, the governor sent British Redcoats to stop it. But they got punked by 3,000 American troops. You see…
“It Aint No Fun When The Rabbits Got The Guns”
So of course the British began to pass gun laws to disarm the colonists, and keep them from receiving more guns. But the American colonist weren’t having it. These events directly preceded the American Revolution. Read more about this Here
Now this piece of information is the most alarming. Because it is in fact what led to the Second Amendment itself!
What is the purpose of the Second Amendment? Here is the FYI. The Second Amendment was put in place for one reason and one reason only. It was put in place so that American citizens could protect themselves against the government.
But don’t take my word for it… read the following quotes.
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”
~Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
“A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
“This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it.”
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the outcome of the vote.”
This is what it’s all about. This is why certain people are so avid about keeping their guns, and so afraid that they will be taken. There are people who know the history, and they see it repeating itself. This is the elephant in the room. This is about “The People” vs. “Those People”
Now of course, very few people will tell you this. This is because if someone comes out and says it, they will be demonized. But I’ll just go ahead and say it. You see, you can call me a conspiracy theorist. But you WON’T call Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin or George Washington conspiracy theorist.
They KNEW what people today have been brainwashed out of knowing. They knew what people in NAZI Germany WISHED they had known. That power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. They knew that once the government began to “feel” itself, that the people would be in trouble. How did they know this? Because they had just dealt with it themselves!
It’s interesting how people scoff at the idea that a certain class of individuals are conspiring to rule the world, or form a New World Order. But why is that so far fetched? After all, if “all these people are so crazy and evil” that gun laws have to be passed to stop them from killing innocent people, then why could not the elite class of the same society be evil also?
Oops… I forgot. People who are in a position of authority are ALWAYS good people! I learned that from the authorities.
I also learned another lesson from the authorities.
“It Aint No Fun, When The Rabbits Got The Guns”
Listen, I’m not here to tell you that background checks and gun permits and restricting gun laws don’t make sense in theory. They definitely do. Because there are crazy people out here. I’m just explaining the push-back against it. I’m just demonstrating the game and how it’s played… so you don’t get played. Because as Ben Franklin said,
“People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.“
On February 17, 1950, Paul Warburg (member of the C.F.R.) stood before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and stated the following, “We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
1. The subjugation and assumption of control of a place or people by use of military force.
2. A territory that has been gained in such a way: “colonial conquests”.
victory – capture – subjugation
Free Your Mind @ July 28, 2013
Have you ever been in a bad mood? Have you ever had a pain shoot through your right leg or left foot? Have you ever had eyelid twitches? Have you ever had irregular, or even regular blood pressure? Are you shy? Have you ever wanted to say something while someone was talking, but then forgot what you were going to say?
Ladies and Gentlemen, if you have any of these problems, I’m sure that your doctor has a drug, or two, for you. You see… Diet and Exercise is just not enough. And I’m sure that this drug will help you immensely. However… Before you take those pills or inject that syringe, I invite you to take a ride with me on the pharmaceutical time machine.
On December 21, 2012 Doctor Emmett Brown’s coveted notes and journals were declassified by the government. I obtained these documents on that very day. Since then I have been working diligently, and I have been able to reconstruct the flux capacitor. Using this, we are fully capable of time travel. But not through a physical vehicle, but a Cyberspace one.
This time, no plutonium is needed. Just pop a couple of http tablets. They will put you in the correct mindset to view the moving images that you are about to see. Come along with me for this beautiful ride. But I must warn you. Once you go on this ride, you may not ever want to come back!
Make The Change
Free Your Mind @ April 16, 2013
Have you ever used these words in the past? Yep, I’m sure you have. It’s a very soothing, comforting phrase. It makes you feel great. It relaxes you, and makes you feel at peace. It’s almost like a relaxing herb!
But this phrase is one of the biggest lies that has ever been uttered. And this lie is even bigger than, “And they lived happily ever after.” And even more deadly. Get the truth about this lie. Do not take offense to what I’m about to say. I’m speaking to myself also.
Free Your Mind Online is teaming up with PowerWallet, which is a simple service that helps you reach your financial goals with real-time tracking of all your accounts. Try it now – it’s free, sets up in minutes, and it works!
If you enjoyed the above article, feel free to promulgate it below.
Free Your Mind @ March 6, 2013
Well… Today is the first day of March. The celebration of Black (actually Civil Rights) History during the month of February is now over. However, now it’s time to deal with some real facts. A while back, I did a post on the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. That was some very powerful and “uncomfortable” info on how things went down with King.
The following rare documentary, “Brother Minister” is a very powerful documentary that exposes a lot of what went on with Malcolm X. If you want to know the mystery behind the history, then the following is something that you definitely will want to check out!
Brother Minister (Part I)
Share, Bookmark or Post this article below
Free Your Mind @ March 1, 2013
The World According To Monsanto
Most people associate the New World Order conspiracy with things such as the FreeMasons, the Illuminati, Skull & Bones etc. And most people realize that these things are connected with the Federal Reserve Bank and the U.S. Government. However, most people don’t realize the role health plays in all of this.
Everyone is running around afraid of “verichips” and “secret police” and “cell phone and computer monitoring.” But the truth is that the real way that the diabolical ones control the masses is by controlling their mind and their health. This is why they put neurotoxic chemicals in vaccines and create GMO Foods that affect brain function (dumbing down the population).
The World According to Monsanto (uploaded by MrMaxBliss) is a great documentary on the Health Arm of the Illuminati and it exposes how they are in collusion with governments and control the food supply. This goes deep into the rabbit hole.
Purchase This Documentary
Share, Bookmark or Post this article below
Free Your Mind @ November 29, 2012
The NFL Replacement Referees 2012
“Justice is indivisible. Injustice anywhere, is a threat to justice everywhere.”
Martin Luther King Jr.
Today, I would like to talk about the debacle that is… The Replacement Officials of 2012. Now, if you follow Free Your Mind Online, then you probably are used to me speaking on much more relevant topics than sports. But by the end, you will see that this may be the most relevant topic ever elucidated on since this blogs inception.
Before I even begin, please don’t take anything I say in this article personal. I’m just speaking in general to all of us (including myself). This piece will be extremely controversial and I’m sure that I will fall out of favor with a lot of people. But… that’s okay. The truth must be told.
Now… You may be wondering why I started off an NFL blog post with a quote from Martin Luther King. Stay tuned.
Before we get to the story of the refs, let’s travel back in time. In 2006, the NFL and the NFLPA signed a 301 page document entitled, “NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement, 2006-2012.” Even though this deal was to last up until the 2012 season, Article LVIII, Section 3 dictated that either the NFL or the NFLPA could opt out of the deal (making the 2010 season the last) as long as they gave a written notice by 11/08/2008. The NFL owners did just that.
The NFL opted out because it didn’t like its share of the current revenue. The owners were claiming that they were having financial struggles. From 2008-2010 no new agreement was reached. The NFL players were fine with the deal and wanted to continue to play. They asked the NFL to extend the deal in order to reach a new deal without interrupting operations. No cigar. The NFLPA decertified, negotiations broke down, and the NFL Owners locked out the players and the war began.
This lockout shut down all NFL operations, including free agency, training camp, active players healthcare etc. It also halted the NFL officials union from reopening their negotiations with the league for their CBA which would expire in 2012. The NFL had claimed that it was having financial struggles, and therefore needed to reduce the player’s revenue share by 18 percent ($1 Billion dollars). They even proposed an 18 game schedule to increase their revenues (even though they claimed that player safety was their priority).
But, the NFL refused to open their books and show any evidence that they were operating at a loss. And on Tuesday, March 1st, 2011, U.S. District Judge David Doty ruled that the NFL owners had violated its agreement with the union and stockpiled 4 Billion dollars to prepare for the lockout. He wrote, “The record shows that the NFL undertook contract renegotiations to advance its own interests and harm the interests of the players,”
The war of words between the players and the NFL got heated. Many players spoke out, calling the commissioner Roger Goodell and the NFL hypocrites and crooks. Adrian Peterson even went as far as to use the term Modern day slavery! Wow! The question was often asked, “Who will win this battle?” And everyone agreed. It was the owners, because they were making the REAL money.
As time passed, people began more nervous about losing games and even worse… Fantasy Football was in jeopardy! A few weighed in on both sides on who was right or wrong, but most people had the same sentiment. WE DON’T CARE WHO IS RIGHT OR WRONG… WE JUST WANT TO WATCH FOOTBALL!
More time passed, and the two sides came closer together. Then… The owners announced a deal that they had approved. The players didn’t like it, and resisted. And for the most part, the fans and the media jumped them saying, “This is a fair deal. Why won’t they take it? Stop being prideful and let us have our game back!” The back and forth continued a little longer, and the last of the kinks got worked out. In due time, the fans got what they wanted, the lockout ended (on July 21, 2011), and all was soon forgotten.
Fast forward to June of 2012. In 2005, the NFL had agreed to a contract with the NFL Referees Association that would last through the 2011 season. The current referees had been guaranteed a retirement pension plan in the 2005 deal, but the NFL wanted to get rid of that and replace it with a 401K (reducing the leagues funding obligation). The refs wanted to keep that pension plan, and that was the major dispute between them and the league.
The NFL season was coming up soon and neither side was going to back down. So the NFL locked out the referees and on June 4th, 2012 they announced that they would hire replacement refs.
The fans were immediately uneasy. How would this affect the games? Who are these people who will be hired? These replacement officials consisted of high school and lower college officials, Arena League officials, and of course… officials that had been FIRED from the Lingerie League.
The preseason started, and ridiculousness quickly ensued. The officials were bad, and the fans were mad. Blown calls occurred left and right! But it wasn’t so much just the blown calls (that always happened), it was the fact that the officials were losing control of the games and they were terrible to watch.
It was also a player safety issue. With all of the new focus on concussions and illegal hits, how could the replacement refs (who could barely master the application of the rules) focus on safety aspect of the game? There was a lot of grumbling amongst the fans, calling the NFL hypocritical. The season came, and a deal between the refs and the league was never made. So the terrible officiating continued into the season.
Even though the officiating was horrible, the general consensus was that if it didn’t end up directly costing a team a game that the NFL wouldn’t be compelled to cave in to the refs and make a deal. But on Monday night September 24th 2012, it happened.
The Inaccurate Reception
This was a tragic event. This was the NFL’s “fall from grace.” The refs had directly decided a game. The fans (not just Green Bay, but worldwide) were outraged. Over 70,000 people called in to the league office and left messages! Even President Obama weighed in on the action. The commissioner, Roger Goodell had the power to overturn this call, but chose not to. The NFL released a statement on the Tuesday after standing behind the results of the game.
And that was the last straw. The NFL had insulted the fans intelligence. And this time, the fans weren’t going to stand for it. The grumblings got more and more intense. Thousands of people began to sign petitions to support the refs and tell the NFL to stop “nickel and diming” them. After all, the NFL was pulling in 9 Billion Dollars, but were fighting the refs over about 3.2 million dollars. People wanted a deal done, and done quickly to give us our game back!
Then, people began to call in and write to the sports networks saying, “That’s it! I’m not watching the NFL anymore! All of the sportscasters responded by saying, “No, we don’t believe you. You are going to continue watching. We are helpless to stop watching this game. You may be angry… but you will continue to tune in.”
And while the aforementioned statement may have been true for most people, the NFL knew that it wasn’t true for all. Eventually the ratings would go down (if even just a little), which would end up costing the league more than the 3.2 million dollars that they were fighting the refs over.
So… Miraculously, in less than 3 days ( even BEFORE the upcoming Thursday game), the NFL was able compromise and to come to a deal with the referees. The details of that deal began to come out, but most fans weren’t even concerned with it. They were just happy that they had their football back.
In that next game, the real referees took the field to a standing ovation (imagine that)! The league claimed that it hadn’t been “punked” into signing a deal, but we all know the truth. The people had spoken, and changes had been made.
But… all wasn’t well. People were still upset. The Packers had lost a game that could (and still may) come back and haunt them. The league had shown its true colors. And even though we would continue to watch the games, a bad taste was left in our mouths.
And I have to admit that I too was left with a bad taste in my mouth. But you see I was never angry with the NFL. I was never angry with the replacement officials and any of the blown calls (including the one that cost the Packers). My problem was WITH THE FANS! Because this was THEIR fault! Yes, you heard me correctly. The fans were and are responsible for this outrage.
You see, people say things like… “Oh look, the NFL Owners are greedy. They make billions and are nickel and diming the refs. “Oh look, the league is being hypocritical. They say they want safety, but they put replacements on the field!”
Well ladies and gentleman… GUESS WHAT! We should have known that the league was hypocritical when it said they wanted safety, but yet pushed for an 18 game season and now has a game on every Thursday! We KNEW that the owners where greedy when they locked out the players to get more revenue share when they already made billions. We knew that owners were greedy when Drew Brees, Matt Forte, Chris Johnson and DeSean Jackson could hardly get fair market value contracts.
And when players spoke out against the commissioner and the league about how hypocritical they were, the media and the fans chastised THEM for “disrespecting” authority and undermining the integrity of the league! How ironic.
Why didn’t 70,000 people call in to the league office when the NFL was pushing for more games? Why aren’t 70,000 people calling the league about games on Thursday?
You know why? Because we don’t give a D**N about player safety. We just want to watch our football. We love Thursday games. We didn’t care about the NFL being hypocrites, because their hypocrisy didn’t affect US!
Why didn’t 70,000 people call into the league office when the NFL claimed they were struggling financially, yet refused to open its books and show where it was losing money before getting caught stockpiling 4 billion dollars?
You know why? Because we didn’t care that the NFL was greedy. Their greed wasn’t affecting US! As long as everyone ELSE was getting screwed, we were fine. We didn’t have a problem until WE got screwed! We didn’t care about who was right or wrong until WE got wronged.
So, how can you be mad at the league for disregarding player safety when YOU don’t care about player safety? How can you be mad at the league for being selfish and greedy when YOU are selfish and greedy? How can you be mad at the league for being hypocritical when YOU are a hypocrite?
So I don’t want to hear all of this whining and moaning (saying the same things we condemned the players for saying) about the league being selfish, greedy and hypocritical. The league HAS ALWAYS been selfish, greedy and hypocritical. And if “We The Fans” had held the NFL accountable for their selfishness, greediness, and hypocrisy while they were screwing others, then none of this would have ever happened.
If the Law of Attraction teaches us anything, it’s that people get what people deserve. What goes around comes around. Like attracts like. So while you sit around and watch The Mann screw everyone else. Just keep sitting there, because eventually The Mann will screw YOU.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had it right. “Justice is indivisible. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
And that’s why this post is just as relevant as anything that I have written upon. It’s not just about sports, it about life. Most people don’t care about what’s right or wrong, unless it applies to them. People don’t see tyranny until it comes knocking on their door. And that’s why the world is in the shape that it’s in right now.
First they came for the communists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
True indeed. This piece applies to everyone from the sports fan to the conspiracy theorists to the conscious population. I have written many articles on injustices here on the planet (and I will continue to do so). I’ve talked about secret societies, health conspiracies, Federal income tax, the Federal Reserve Bank and anything else you want to think about.
But the truth is that we can sit here all day and talk about the Illuminati, The Vatican, Skull and Bones and all of the diabolical elite. But we can’t really be mad and them because they are nothing more than a reflection of the Population In General.
A few years back a documentary was done that was call from Freedom to Fascism. This is a great documentary (that I recommend) to watch, but the only problem that I had with it was the premise that America was free until a group stole our freedom in 1913. I’m here to say that this is an incorrect premise.
Tyranny didn’t begin here in the year 1913. Tyranny did not begin here even as a result of anything that happened on May 1st 1776. Tyranny began on this soil in the year 1492… by a man who we celebrated earlier this month. This tyranny was continued by those “Founding Fathers” in 1776 who are said to have founded this country on “Christian” values.
The same secret societies that we complain about today are the same ones that the Founding Fathers were in. But the tyranny of 1492 and 1776 didn’t affect everyone; it only affected certain people, while benefiting others. But now that those same elite groups of people have now streamlined and are directing their tyrannical efforts towards everyone, people are beginning to have a real problem.
I realize that the past can’t be changed, but our perspective can be. You can’t fight against tyranny while simultaneously celebrating tyrants. You can’t move towards freedom while simultaneously paying homage to those who stole and restricted freedom. We don’t need to return this country back to the so called glory days of July 4, 1776. What we need here is freedom and justice for all.
Mike Adams of Natural News wrote a great article (Philosophy of Freedom) on those who are opposed to the U.S. government restricting OUR freedom, while at the same time supporting their right to restrict other people’s freedom. His perspective is right on the money.
In conclusion, there has been much said about what we can do to stop those wicked rulers who run the planet. But the true solution is not without, it is within. Your wish is your command. Once people begin to desire true justice, instead of “Just Us,” then that is ultimately what we will get.
But until then… the struggle continues.
So until next time.
Free Your Mind… Online.
Free Your Mind @ October 31, 2012
This article is written specifically for those out there who believe that you have free will when you visit your local supermarket.
In this day in age, marketers know what makes consumers react better than the consumers themselves. Enter below and find out how to win the battle of the mind!
Using this guide, you can learn how to create your own renewable energy sources right in your own back yard.
If you enjoyed the above article, feel free to promulgate it below.
Free Your Mind @ October 2, 2012